Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    channon21 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default alimony modification

    Ex spouse with periodic permanent alimonyicon (now age 60) has approx $500K in IRA. I would like to reduce my alimony, based on her ability to draw on her retirement funds since she is older that 59 1/2. (I provided every nickel of the IRA). Ex spouse is under employed. Is there case law to support imputing a reasonable (say 4%, yearly) of the available funds to mitigate my alimony payment? I was informed (?misinformed) that she is not required to use these funds until she is 65, thereby drawing more alimony. No change in need. I have the ability to pay, and make significantly more than she does. Does that matter?
    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Attorney Howard Iken's Avatar
    Attorney Howard Iken is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States, 105638029469653, Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    2,622
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Resources available to her mattered more at the time of the final judgment.

    At this point, you must prove a "substantial change in circumstances." If everything is pretty much the same, including that CD, you cannot get a modificationicon.

    Attorney Howard Ikenicon

  3. #3
    channon21 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default "Substantial change and modification

    Quote Originally Posted by admin View Post
    Resources available to her mattered more at the time of the final judgment.

    At this point, you must prove a "substantial change in circumstances." If everything is pretty much the same, including that CD, you cannot get a modificationicon.

    Attorney Howard Ikenicon
    The substantial change relates to being unable and unwise to draw on retirement funds at age 45, but at age 59 1/2, the funds are there for retirement and support, and it is financially sound to make periodic withdrawals. There are no penalties involved with funds withdrawal. (Even if it is just that interest or dividends that are used) This goes toward the ability of the spouse to be self sufficient. Need is met by retirement funds. Thanks.

  4. #4
    Attorney Howard Iken's Avatar
    Attorney Howard Iken is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States, 105638029469653, Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    2,622
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Sorry but I still do not think that will do it.

    The "substantial change" must be something that "was not foreseeable at the time of final judgment."

    I know that is not what you want to hear. But that is my opinion.


    Keep in mind, attorneys rarely agree on anything.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •